Using AI boosts scientific productivity and career prospects, finds study – Physics World

Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
Sign into your Physics World account to get access to all available digital issues of the monthly magazine. Your Physics World account is separate to any IOP accounts you may have
Create a Physics World account to get access to all available digital issues of the monthly magazine. Your Physics World account is separate to any IOP accounts you may have.
Note: The verification e-mail to complete your account registration should arrive immediately. However, in some cases it takes longer. Don’t forget to check your spam folder.
If you haven’t received the e-mail in 24 hours, please contact customerservices@ioppublishing.org.
Please enter the e-mail address you used to register to reset your password
Note: The verification e-mail to change your password should arrive immediately. However, in some cases it takes longer. Don’t forget to check your spam folder.
If you haven’t received the e-mail in 24 hours, please contact customerservices@ioppublishing.org
Thank you for registering with Physics World
If you’d like to change your details at any time, please visit My account
Using artificial intelligence (AI) increases scientists’ productivity and impact but collectively leads to a shrinking of research focus. That is according to an analysis of more than 41 million research papers by scientist in China and the US, which finds that scientists who produce AI-augmented research also progress faster in their careers than their colleagues who do not (Nature 649 1237).
The study was carried out by James Evans, a sociologist at the University of Chicago, and his colleagues who analysed 41.3 million papers listed in the OpenAlex dataset published between 1980 and 2025. They looked at papers in physics and five other disciplines – biology, chemistry, geology, materials science and medicine.
Using an AI language model to identify AI-assisted work, the team picked out almost 310 000 AI-augmented papers from the dataset. They found that AI-supported publications receive more citations than no-AI-assisted papers, while also being more impactful across multiple indicators and having a higher prevalence in high-impact journals.
Individual researchers who adopt AI publish, on average, three times as many papers and get almost five times as many citations as those not using AI. In physics, researchers who use AI tools garner 183 citations every year, on average, while those who do not use AI get only 51 annually.
AI also boosts career trajectories. Based on an analysis of more than two million scientists in the dataset, the study finds that junior researchers who adopt AI are more likely to become established scientists. They also gain project leadership roles almost one-and-a-half years earlier, on average, than those who do not use AI.
But when the researchers examined the knowledge spread of a random sample of 10 000 papers, half of which used AI, they found that AI-produced work shrinks the range of topics covered by almost 5%. The finding is consistent across all six disciplines. Furthermore, AI papers are more clustered than non-AI papers, suggesting a tendency to concentrate on specific problems.
Knowledge grows step-by-step despite the exponential growth of papers, finds study
AI tools, in other words, appear to funnel research towards areas rich in data and help to automate established fields rather than exploring new topics. Evans and colleagues think this AI-induced convergence could drive science away from foundational questions and towards data-rich operational topics.
AI could, however, help combat this trend. “We need to reimagine AI systems that expand not only cognitive capacity but also sensory and experimental capacity,” they say. “[This could] enable and incentivize scientists to search, select and gather new types of data from previously inaccessible domains rather than merely optimizing analysis of standing data.”
Meanwhile, a new report by the AI company OpenAI has found that messages on advanced topics in science and mathematics on ChatGPT over the last year have grown by nearly 50%, to almost 8.4 million per week. The firm says its generative AI chatbot is being used to advance research across scientific fields from experiment planning and literature synthesis to mathematical reasoning and data analysis.
Note: The verification e-mail to complete your account registration should arrive immediately. However, in some cases it takes longer. Don’t forget to check your spam folder.
If you haven’t received the e-mail in 24 hours, please contact customerservices@ioppublishing.org.
Michael Allen is a science writer based in the UK
Physics World represents a key part of IOP Publishing’s mission to communicate world-class research and innovation to the widest possible audience. The website forms part of the Physics World portfolio, a collection of online, digital and print information services for the global scientific community.

source

Scroll to Top