Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.
Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in
Swipe for next article
For many, AI feels like the future of fitness coaching because it is fast, cheap and readily available
Removed from bookmarks
I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the fitness industry: people can now ask chatbots to write marathon plans, build gym programs and even adjust workouts based on sleep or heart rate data.
For many, AI feels like the future of fitness coaching because it is fast, cheap and readily available.
But while AI can be helpful, research suggests it still has limitations, especially when compared with experienced human coaches.
So, let’s look at how it all works and the pros and cons.
There is very little research examining exactly why people use AI for exercise programs, but researchers have offered some potential explanations.
Firstly, accessibility and cost: a chatbot can create a strength or running program in seconds without you having to wait for an appointment with an exercise professional. Not to mention these can be generated for free.
Secondly, availability. There is some research indicating people appreciate rapid feedback in real-time from AI tools. For example, you could ask an AI tool how to change an exercise due to knee pain and get a response in seconds. However, if you are following a program prescribed by a human coach, you may need to wait a day or two before discussing the issue and receiving feedback.
There is a growing body of research looking at the suitability of AI-generated exercise programs across a host of contexts.
One study had ChatGPT design an individualised exercise program for five made-up people, which were then evaluated by a team of experts. They concluded the AI tool could provide safe, basic exercise recommendations, but may not provide enough adaptability to ensure long-term progress.
Similarly, another study had expert running coaches assess AI-generated running programs. They thought the exercise programs were suitable for novices but not great for trained athletes.
The effectiveness of these programs appear to be highly dependent on the level of information provided. In short, the more context you can provide regarding your current capabilities, goals and fitness level, the better the exercise program will be.
However, providing such detailed prompts requires a degree of content-specific knowledge that many people don’t have. This may make AI tools less useful to the average person.
Finally, it is not clear whether AI systems can fully account for injuries or medical conditions. Health screening is important to keep people safe before exercising and something all exercise professionals should do before writing you a program.
If this is being missed, there is the potential for an AI-generated exercise program to be unsafe for your current level of health.
There is a small body of research comparing AI-generated exercise programs to human generated programs and the results are interesting.
One recent study randomly allocated people to one of two groups: a 12-week weight training program under the guidance of ChatGPT or a 12-week program under the guidance of a personal trainer.
There were larger increases in muscle size and strength in the personal trainer group.
Hunter Bennett is a Lecturer in Exercise Science at Adelaide University.
This article was originally published by The Conversation and is republished under a Creative Commons licence. Read the original article.
Another compared a five-week AI generated fitness program to a five-week human-generated program. It found the human-generated program led to slightly greater increases in fitness and endurance than the AI program.
Finally, a third study compared a ten-week AI generated athletic performance program against a ten-week human generated program on measures of jump performance in volleyball athletes. They found the human program led to slightly greater improvements in jump distance but the same improvements in jump height.
Collectively, these studies suggest that while AI-generated exercise programs can improve your fitness, they might be slightly less effective than programs created by human experts. This may be due to their inability to provide real-time feedback and motivation.
However, it is also important to note these studies were all published in relatively low-quality journals and had some limitations. So, their findings should be interpreted with caution.
If you choose to use AI, there are some key things to keep in mind:
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in
