Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
In what could be a pivotal point that potentially reshapes the boundaries around AI and intellectual property, a US Federal judge has ordered OpenAI to disclose millions of anonymised chat longs from ChatGPT. While privacy advocates are concerned over how it would result data revelations, the publishing industry is cock-a-hoop.
Not surprising, given that Judge Ona Wang in the Manhattan District Court gave this ruling in a lawsuit brought by The New York Times and others over copyright infringement. In some ways, this was a battle between content creators and AI freeloaders around how developers were training their models.
The judge rejected OpenAI’s privacy-related objections to an earlier order requiring OpenAI to submit the records as evidence, which the ChatGPT maker had criticised as “breaking with common-sense security practices.” “There are multiple layers of protection in this case precisely because of the highly sensitive and private nature of much of the discovery,” Wang ruled while rejecting the plea.
The lawsuit was initiated in 2023 against OpenAI and Microsoft accusing them of illegally procuring copyrighted material to train AI models, with NYT and others claiming that ChatGPT reproduced and distorted their articles without permission. This, they said, was tantamount to stealing. They had sought chat logs to prove this claim.
Experts view this judgment as opening a window into the “opaque world of AI” and expects the 20 million chat logs to provide information around how ChatGPT regurgitates existing content. The court asked OpenAI to provide the logs in a de-identified format that strips off personal identifiers while retaining the substance of the chats.
While fair use of content for training AI models is at the heart of the lawsuit, the ruling could assist lawyers prosecuting OpenAI around teen suicides. The company is currently facing as many as seven lawsuits on this front. The Sam Altman-led company had raised a furore by claiming that the victim had overridden “safety features” on ChatGPT.
The latest ruling from the Manhattan court builds up on similar decisions where the law had compelled technology companies to open up their black boxes. A recent instance of a German court holding OpenAI liable for reproducing song lyrics without permission is a case in point.
Are there any user privacy implications?
Since lawsuits across the world are used to set precedents for future rulings, the question now revolves around privacy in the AI age. Experts are concerned that de-identified data could still be reverse-engineered to reveal sensitive information. “Anything you say to AI may be used against you in court,” says a user on X (formerly Twitter).
OpenAI and others in the business have assured users that chat logs aren’t indefinitely stored but this ruling raises questions. OpenAI responded to the latest ruling hinted at potential appeals over claims that broad disclosure could stifle innovation. However, till date courts have prioritised corporate accountability over secrecy.
For daily users like this author, the ruling provides better awareness around how the AI systems work. It has been mentioned in the past that while OpenAI logs data for enhancing its capabilities, its use of deleted and sensitive chats could stymie adoption. Of course, accessing personal information isn’t new as Google has done it for years.
What could be the repercussions around the industry?
From the perspective of the media industry, the case could result in publishing houses getting their hands into the deep pockets of these AI startups, given that as many as 60 copyrights suits have been filed in the US alone. Competitors such as Meta and Microsoft too face similar scrutiny as does Google over unauthorised data scraping.
These cases are seen as a global pushback against AI’s unbridled growth which has already caused revenue losses to publishers. In fact, People Inc. had produced data to prove that since its launch Google Summaries has resulted in publishers losing a big chunk of their revenues from the search industry.
Without doubt, the immediate impact of this ruling could be more publishing companies targeting AI companies for licensing deals that could shave off billions from the kitty of these massively funded startups. Paid data partnerships could become the name of the game as seen from OpenAI’s recent moves with publishers.
How would it impact the regulatory environment?
It could accelerate calls for transparency across countries that are grappling with the right ways to draw guardrails around AI, where innovation continues without hampering data privacy and cybersecurity fears. The US itself has no comprehensive AI law but the State of California passed a law to provide transparency in AI business.
Legal experts believe AI startups would need to justify their data practices given the ruling by Judge Wang that dismissed OpenAI’s burden arguments and prioritised evidentiary needs. Of course, this may not result in curtailing ethical debates and actions by whistleblowers who have claim that AI profits result from uncompensated labour.
Could this bring a shift around innovations and future use-cases?
Tough to tell for now, but suffice to say that AI giants might seek ways to advance the level of anonymisation in order to accelerate privacy and data security. Which way this exercise could go is still a mystery as the recent experiments by French AI startup Mistral does suggest that training smaller AI models could be an option. Even for a company as large as OpenAI, such a move may curtail infringement risks.
Given the recent spate of lawsuits around teen suicides, the new age tech giants may feel more committed to analyse chat logs to ascertain behaviour patterns of their models and provide fixes at launch. OpenAI had reportedly fixed some of the issues around open-ended chats with teens with its latest model – the GPT-5.
Would such litigation actually kill innovation?
Opinion is sharply divided on this question with proponents claiming that this could well sound the death knell for AI chatbots and the rest of the world countering it with the view that opening up a black box would just reduce the mystique. They point to Europe’s stricter rules under the AI Act and how it hasn’t yet stymied innovation in any way.
Experts have earlier noted that sharing data collected from multiple sources does not compel any AI company to share the secret sauce (algorithms) that they use to deliver customized results. When it comes to agentic AI use cases, the argument does not hold water as these data sets come from within an enterprise and isn’t publicly available.
The lawyers taking a swipe at OpenAI and others for causing irreversible psychological harm to users believe that the order could actually help them deep dive into issues that prompt these chatbots to hallucinate or respond in a human way. Recently some users had sought help from the Federal Trade Commission after noting that their complaints on the mental wellness issues was going uncared for by OpenAI and others.
CXOtoday is a premier resource on the world of IT, relevant to key business decision makers. We offer IT perspective & news to the C-suite audience. We also provide business and technology news to those who evaluate, invest, and manage the IT infrastructure of organizations. CXOtoday has a well-networked and strong community that encourages discussions on what’s happening in the world of IT and its impact on businesses.
Copyright © 2025 Trivone. All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Websites store cookies to enhance functionality and personalise your experience. You can manage your preferences, but blocking some cookies may impact site performance and services.
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Marketing cookies are used to follow visitors to websites. The intention is to show ads that are relevant and engaging to the individual user.
You can find more information in our Privacy Policy and Privacy Policy.