Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
Subscribe
Adolescents increasingly turn to AI for mental health advice, with 90% finding it helpful, raising questions about care quality and safety.
Jonathan Cantor, PhD, a senior policy researcher at RAND, discussed emerging research on adolescents’ use of artificial intelligence (AI) for mental health advice and longstanding gaps in access to behavioral health care. He noted that limited availability of child and adolescent mental health services, compounded by heightened concern during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, motivated interest in whether young people were turning to AI tools for support.
Using the newly launched, nationally representative RAND American Youth Panel, Cantor and colleagues fielded survey questions assessing whether adolescents and young adults sought mental health advice from AI when experiencing negative emotions, how frequently they did so, and how helpful they perceived the responses to be.1 Approximately 13% of respondents—representing an estimated 5.4 million US youth—reported using AI for mental health advice.2 Older adolescents and young adults were more likely to report use, with about two-thirds engaging at least monthly. More than 90% of users reported that the advice was helpful.
Cantor emphasized that these findings provided some of the first nationally representative data on adolescent mental health–related AI use and suggested that such use was already widespread and perceived positively by users. He cautioned, however, that perceived helpfulness did not equate to clinical appropriateness or quality of care. He underscored the need for further research to understand how adolescents interact with these tools, how AI systems respond across varying levels of distress, and whether use complements or attempts to substitute for professional care.
For psychiatrists and policymakers, Cantor highlighted critical unanswered questions regarding safety, privacy, parental involvement, and guardrails for AI being used by younger individuals. He concluded that systematic data collection and reporting standards were essential to inform policy and clinical discussions, stressing that AI should not replace human-delivered mental health care but might play a role that warranted careful, evidence-based evaluation.
Dr Cantor is a senior policy researcher at RAND.
References
1. RAND launches national youth survey panel to elevate student voices in education research. RAND March 7, 2024. Accessed December 15, 2024.
2. McBain RK, Bozick R, Diliberti M, et al.
Receive trusted psychiatric news, expert analysis, and clinical insights — subscribe today to support your practice and your patients.
January 23-24, 2026
Michael Asbach, DMSc, PA-C; Erin Crown, MHS, PA-C, Psych-CAQ
Amber Hoberg, MSN, APRN, PMHNP-BC; Erin Crown, PA-C, Psych-CAQ
Jonathan Meyer, MD; Jacob Hanaie, PharmD, APh, BCPP; Sanjai Rao, MD, DFAPA
July 10-11, 2026
Gus Alva, MD, DFAPA; Ilan Melnick, MD
Jason Kellogg, MD; Gus Alva, MD, DFAPA; Melanie Barrett, MD; Yvette Elpidio, MSN, FNP-C
October 2-3, 2026
December 4-5, 2026
Jason Kellogg, MD; Gus Alva, MD, DFAPA; Melanie Barrett, MD; Yvette Elpidio, MSN, FNP-C
Gus Alva, MD, DFAPA; Ilan Melnick, MD
259 Prospect Plains Rd, Bldg H
Cranbury, NJ 08512
609-716-7777
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences®
All rights reserved.