Elon Musk lawsuit over OpenAI for-profit conversion can head to trial, US judge says – The Hindu

Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
January 8, 2026e-Paper
The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.
First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.
Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.
Science For All The weekly newsletter from science writers takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in!
Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers
Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there
The Hindu On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.
January 8, 2026e-Paper
Published – January 08, 2026 10:02 am IST
OpenAI contends that Musk failed to bring his allegations in a timely manner [File] | Photo Credit: REUTERS
Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk persuaded a judge on Wednesday to ‌allow a jury trial on his allegations that ChatGPT maker ​OpenAI violated its founding mission in its high-profile restructuring to a for-profit entity.
Musk was a cofounder of OpenAI in 2015 but left in 2018 and now runs an AI company that competes with it. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California, said at a hearing that there was “plenty of evidence” suggesting OpenAI’s leaders made assurances that its original nonprofit structure was going to ​be maintained.
The judge said there were enough disputed facts to let ⁠a jury consider the claims at a trial scheduled for March, rather than decide the issues herself. She said she would issue a written order after the hearing that addresses OpenAI’s bid ​to throw out the case. The court ⁠battle comes amid a broader showdown over dominance in the market for generative artificial intelligence. Musk’s xAI and its chatbot Grok are competing with OpenAI and other technology developers.
Musk is seeking unspecified monetary damages from what he calls “ill-gotten ‌gains” by OpenAI.
OpenAI in a statement after the hearing said, “Mr Musk’s lawsuit ‌continues to be baseless and a part of his ongoing pattern of harassment, and we look forward to demonstrating this at ‍trial.”
Musk’s artificial intelligence startup, xAI, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Musk contends he contributed about $38 million, roughly 60% of OpenAI’s early funding, along ‍with strategic guidance and credibility, based on assurances that the organisation would remain a nonprofit dedicated to the public benefit. The lawsuit accuses OpenAI co-founders Sam Altman and Greg Brockman of plotting a for-profit switch to enrich themselves, culminating in multibillion-dollar deals with Microsoft and a recent restructuring.
OpenAI, Altman and Brockman have denied the claims, and they called Musk “a frustrated commercial competitor seeking to slow down a mission-driven market leader.”
Microsoft, which is also a defendant, urged Gonzalez Rogers to toss Musk’s claims against ⁠it. A lawyer for Microsoft said there was no evidence that the company “aided and abetted” OpenAI.
Microsoft did not immediately respond to a ​request for comment.
Lawyers for OpenAI at the hearing asked Gonzalez Rogers to enter judgment ⁠against Musk, contending that he had not shown enough of a factual basis to sustain his allegations including fraud and breach of contract.
OpenAI also contends that Musk failed to bring his allegations in a timely manner. Gonzalez Rogers said the jury would be asked to weigh whether the ⁠lawsuit was filed outside the statute of limitations.
Published – January 08, 2026 10:02 am IST
technology (general)
Copyright© 2026, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
BACK TO TOPBack to Top
Terms & conditions  |  Institutional Subscriber
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

source

Scroll to Top