Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.
Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.
As someone who spends a lot of time evaluating AI chatbots, I find the launch of GPT-5.1 as disappointing as that of GPT-5. Despite OpenAI trumpeting advances in response quality, a warmer, friendlier tone, and ways to make ChatGPT uniquely yours, the latest update largely doesn’t impress me in practice. I encountered flashes of a fresh personality, but nothing that drastically changes the chatbot’s feel. Here’s what you should (and shouldn’t) expect from the newest iteration of ChatGPT.
According to OpenAI’s blog post, GPT-5.1 (which is out now) is faster and more intelligent than GPT-5 across the board. This might be true in certain scenarios, but I haven’t noticed a significant difference in GPT-5.1’s response quality or speed in real-world testing. That said, GPT-5 (and even GPT-4o) didn’t exactly struggle in those areas in the first place.
Beyond performance enhancements, OpenAI says that GPT-5.1 is “warmer and more empathetic” in general. This is a somewhat stark reversal from earlier in 2025 when OpenAI updated GPT-4o’s personality to be less friendly and sycophantic. OpenAI also added several new personalities to ChatGPT that further impact the model’s tone. GPT-5 had Cynic, Listener, Nerd, and Robot personalities, but GPT-5.1 changes Listener to Friendly and Robot to Efficient, while adding the Candid, Professional, and Quirky options.
It was already possible to use custom instructions to dictate exactly how you wanted ChatGPT to behave, but GPT-5.1 supposedly adheres to those instructions better. This dovetails nicely with GPT-5.1’s personality and tone changes, because you’re free to adjust things if the default choices don’t quite appeal to you.
Before I talk about my impressions, it’s important to keep in mind that my testing isn’t definitive. Your experience with ChatGPT might vary significantly due to the variable nature of chatbots. However, since I use ChatGPT regularly and am very familiar with how it behaves, I was able to pick out some occasional and slight differences between how GPT-5.1 and GPT-5 respond to prompts.
For example, when I asked both models about what one can do to be less anxious, GPT-5.1’s responses did feel warmer and more empathetic than GPT-5’s. But this wasn’t the case when I asked about farming loot in the video game ARC Raiders. So, yes, you can expect a slightly kinder ChatGPT with GPT-5.1, but only if your prompt opens the door to a more personable response. And again, it’s highly dependent on the topic.
It’s a similar story with GPT-5.1’s new personalities. For example, if you say “heyo” to GPT-5.1 with its Quirky personality engaged, ChatGPT responds, “A small hello rolls in like a marble across a tabletop.🎱What’s the vibe today?” If I do the same thing with its Efficient personality, it says, “Hey.” A personality shines through only when your prompts give it the space to do so. A generic greeting has that potential, but a technical question doesn’t. Nonetheless, if you want a quirkier ChatGPT, feel free to use the corresponding personality.
What if you don’t want to use a personality preset but instead want the chatbot to take on a more specific persona? In that case, you can give ChatGPT custom instructions, which OpenAI says GPT-5.1 should be better at following. I told GPT-5.1 to “Speak only like a surfer dudebro from the late 1990s living outside the Santa Monica beach would.” Accordingly, GPT-5.1 peppered “bro” and “ride the wave” and “surf’s up” into responses, but so did GPT-5 when I gave it the same instructions.
It’s entirely possible that GPT-5.1 adheres to instructions better than GPT-5 over the course of longer conversations, but I didn’t notice a major difference in my casual chats. Overall, OpenAI’s somewhat anemic implementation of personality across GPT-5.1 and GPT-5 strikes me as disappointing. Adding in a few new words here and there doesn’t make a world of difference, and you generally need open-ended prompts to experience the effect of custom instructions or a personality preset in a major way.
If you felt GPT-5’s personality was a downgrade from GPT-4o’s, you might see GPT-5.1’s custom instructions, new personalities, and tone changes as moves in the right direction. That said, you might still be disappointed since the changes aren’t radical in most instances, even with custom instructions.
If you didn’t care that much about ChatGPT’s tone in the first place, the good news is that GPT-5.1 doesn’t feel quite as sycophantic as GPT-4o’s did at times. You can also just safely ignore its new personalities and not bother with custom instructions. I don’t like an especially friendly (or quirky) chatbot or one that’s overly cold and robotic, so I’m happy to use ChatGPT’s default setting. I largely don’t notice much of a difference with the new model based on what I usually ask the chatbot, and your experience is likely to be the same if you didn’t click with GPT-4o’s behavioral tendencies.
If you really want an AI companion, I recommend using a dedicated service. AI chatbots, be it ChatGPT or even Grok with its virtual characters, simply can’t match the robust personality customization options that AI companion apps specialize in, even if you can push chatbots to adopt slightly different tones and behave in slightly different ways.
Read Our Editorial Mission Statement and Testing Methodologies.
My Experience
I’ve been writing about consumer technology and video games for over a decade at a variety of publications, including Destructoid, GamesRadar+, Lifewire, PCGamesN, Trusted Reviews, and What Hi-Fi?, among many others. At PCMag, I review AI and productivity software—everything from chatbots to to-do list apps. In my free time, I’m likely cooking something, playing a game, or tinkering with my computer.
The Technology I Use
I use a ThinkPad for work, but my heart belongs to the PC I built with a fully custom water-cooling loop down to the SSD. Outside of that, I usually hang onto a Pro Max iPhone for a couple of years before getting the latest model. I also spend a decent amount of time with an aging Kindle.
As for software, I’ve used Chrome and iTunes for too long to stop. I rely on the Google Suite for organization and backing up my data, and I couldn’t enjoy my days off without Discord and Steam. I typically write down what I need to do in the Notes app on my iPhone.
For audio, I’m a lover of cables, especially the ones that connect to my Shure SRH-1540 daily drivers. At home, my Yamaha RX-V583 receiver drives a pair of Paradigm Prestige 15Bs for stereo entertainment, with enough Polk speakers in concert to round out a 7.1 setup.
I’ve been writing about consumer technology and video games for over a decade at a variety of publications, including Destructoid, GamesRadar+, Lifewire, PCGamesN, Trusted Reviews, and What Hi-Fi?, among many others. At PCMag, I review AI and productivity software—everything from chatbots to to-do list apps. In my free time, I’m likely cooking something, playing a game, or tinkering with my computer.
I use a ThinkPad for work, but my heart belongs to the PC I built with a fully custom water-cooling loop down to the SSD. Outside of that, I usually hang onto a Pro Max iPhone for a couple of years before getting the latest model. I also spend a decent amount of time with an aging Kindle.
As for software, I’ve used Chrome and iTunes for too long to stop. I rely on the Google Suite for organization and backing up my data, and I couldn’t enjoy my days off without Discord and Steam. I typically write down what I need to do in the Notes app on my iPhone.
For audio, I’m a lover of cables, especially the ones that connect to my Shure SRH-1540 daily drivers. At home, my Yamaha RX-V583 receiver drives a pair of Paradigm Prestige 15Bs for stereo entertainment, with enough Polk speakers in concert to round out a 7.1 setup.
Read full bio
PCMag.com is a leading authority on technology, delivering lab-based, independent reviews of the latest products and services. Our expert industry analysis and practical solutions help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.
For over 40 years, PCMag has been a trusted authority on technology, delivering independent, labs-based reviews of the latest products and services. With expert analysis and practical solutions across consumer electronics, software, security, and more, PCMag helps consumers make informed buying decisions and get the most from their tech. From in-depth reviews to the latest news and how-to guides, PCMag is the go-to source for staying ahead in the digital world.