Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
Latest news
Editions
Five chatbots now compete to write your emails, reports and client letters in Ireland, and every one of them changed in the past five weeks. Anthropic shipped Claude Opus 5.5 on 22 September, Sonnet 5.5 on 28 September and Haiku 5.5 on 7 October, according to StackSpend’s October 2026 model roundup. OpenAI began rolling out GPT-6 on 7 October, and Google made Gemini 4 Argon available on 13 October. Mistral put Large 4 into public preview on 6 October. Picking the best AI chatbot for writing means choosing among models that are all under four weeks old.
This guide ranks the five on what we can verify: current model names, plan structure, prices, availability, data handling and fit for Irish office writing. It does not report a blind test of our own. No independent benchmark of Irish English prose quality existed in the sources we checked, so we say that plainly instead of inventing scores. Where a vendor makes a claim, we label it as the vendor’s claim. Where a number comes from a single source, we hedge it.
If you want a pure model matchup rather than a writing guide, our head-to-head of Gemini 4 Argon, Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol covers the flagship models. This piece stays focused on the daily job: drafting, rewriting, summarising and polishing text that Irish readers will actually see.
Don't miss new tech stories on Google
Add Tech Insider once in the Google app and our stories appear in your news suggestions.
Our ranking comes from fit, price and availability, so treat it as editorial judgement. Here is the order, with the reason for each slot.
Two caveats shape that list. First, the gap between slots one and two is a matter of taste and workflow, not a measured quality difference. Second, the order could shuffle within weeks. OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Mistral each shipped a major model since late September, and several of the smaller releases are still rolling out by plan and region.
The takeaway: start with the free tier of ChatGPT or Claude, run the ten-prompt test described below on your own documents, and only then pay. Most Irish writers will not need anything above an entry paid plan. The $100, $200 and $500 tiers exist for heavy agentic work, not for drafting emails.
The timeline matters because current shifts fast. Here is what the verified sources show, in order.
Two older names deserve a status note. GPT-5.6 was superseded or supplemented by the GPT-6 models, though the sources do not say OpenAI retired it. Claude Haiku 4.5 is no longer Anthropic’s newest small model, because Haiku 5.5 replaced it at the top of that line. Anthropic also introduced Claude Mythos 5.1 on 6 October, but access stays limited to vetted organisations for cybersecurity and biology work, so it is irrelevant to this comparison.
Google announced Genie 4 on 27 October, and it sounds like a chatbot rival. It is not. DeepMind describes it as a world-simulation model in research preview for trusted testers, so ignore it for writing.
For wider context on where these launches sit, see our AI and machine learning coverage.
The table below uses only verified facts. Where our sources did not confirm a cell, it says so.
A few cells deserve a footnote. The Gemini 4 Argon price is an introductory rate that Google says ends on 30 November, and the higher rate applies from 1 December. Mistral Large 4 prices are preview prices, so they can change at general release. And the Newest release date row shows the most recent launch we could verify for each product, not necessarily the model you get on the free plan.
Writing quality is the hardest thing to rank, and most best AI chatbot lists skip the problem by trusting vibes. A fairer approach splits the job into checks you can run yourself in under an hour. We use these ten, and we suggest you run them on your own documents before paying for anything.
Score each model with a simple pass or fail per check on the same three source documents. A chatbot that passes eight of ten on your material beats one that wins a public leaderboard on someone else’s. The method also protects you from a trap: models improve every few weeks, and a ranking you read today may describe a model that no longer ships by default.
Gaeilge deserves its own test. If you write bilingual notices, signage or social posts, run the model’s Irish output past a fluent speaker before publishing. Our Gaeilge benchmark of ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini covers that question in depth. None of the sources we verified for this guide ranks Irish-language or Irish-English quality across all five products. The ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Mistral material we reviewed settles nothing on the subject, and Mistral’s own announcements stress professional document work, not Irish style.
That gap is worth stating loudly. Any site that tells you one chatbot writes the best Irish English without showing its test set is guessing. We would rather hand you the test.
Paste this at the start of a new chat, or store it as a custom instruction where the product allows it. It forces the Irish conventions up front, so the checks above start from a fair position.
ChatGPT remains the default for most people, and the October 2026 update gives it a real feature to point at. OpenAI announced GPT-6 on 7 October with Intelligent UI, which means answers can contain interactive interfaces instead of plain text. For writers, that matters most in structured documents. A report with a comparison table, a budget or a form is easier to build and adjust when the interface sits inside the reply.
The plan structure is wide. OpenAI lists Free, Go, Plus, Pro, Business and Enterprise, and Edu appears as a further tier in the release notes. Model access varies by plan. According to OpenAI’s help centre, Plus, Pro, Business and Enterprise users get GPT-6 Sol, while Free and Go users get GPT-6 Luna. OpenAI’s plan table lists GPT-6.1 Sol as available on Plus and expanded on Pro, but not on Free or Go. In plain terms, a free account writes with the cheaper Luna model, and the full Sol line starts at Plus.
OpenAI describes GPT-6.1 Sol as an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol, with stronger agentic coding, computer use and professional-work performance. Those are not writing claims, so read them as signals of general capability rather than proof of better prose. The newest named release, GPT-6.1 Terra, is reportedly aimed at visual reasoning, computer use and writing. Only a single source reports that, and OpenAI’s own page lines show it rolling out in ChatGPT Work and Codex first, so do not plan around it yet.
Pricing at the top end changed. OpenAI now lists three Pro tiers: Pro 100 at $100 a month, Pro 200 at $200 and the newly introduced Pro 500 at $500. Pro 200 returned for new subscribers. People who held Pro 200 between 22 and 29 September keep the earlier usage allowance through 29 October, after which the plan moves to a lower included allowance at the same $200 price. Almost no one drafting emails needs any of this, but the news explains why some Irish teams saw their limits shift this week.
One benefit is specific to Irish charities. OpenAI says nonprofits can get up to a 75% discount on ChatGPT Business or ChatGPT Enterprise through OpenAI for Nonprofits. If your organisation qualifies, that cuts the cost of a team writing tool sharply.
On adoption, ChatGPT is the name most people already know. We could not verify current Irish usage figures, but reach matters for writing because your colleagues, clients and agencies probably already use it, and shared prompts travel easily. For a closer look at how ChatGPT hooks into other apps, see our app integration comparison.
Where it fits: general drafting, structured documents, mixed teams and anyone who wants one subscription that does most things. Where it lags: Free and Go users do not get Sol-class models, and we found no independent evidence that ChatGPT writes better Irish English than its rivals.
Claude has the simplest model ladder of the five. We found no benchmark showing it writes better than its rivals, but the product structure keeps the choice easy. Anthropic runs three tiers of the 5.5 generation. Opus 5.5 (22 September) is the flagship, Sonnet 5.5 (28 September) sits in the middle, and Haiku 5.5 (7 October) is the fast, cheap small model.
For almost every writing task, Sonnet 5.5 is the model to try first. Anthropic’s own page says it plainly: “Claude Sonnet 5.5 is a clear upgrade over Claude Sonnet 5, runs 30%+ faster, and costs up to 30% less for most work.” That is a vendor claim, and it compares Sonnet 5.5 with its predecessor, not with rivals. It still tells you where Anthropic aims the model: everyday knowledge work at a sensible price. Opus 5.5 targets agentic coding and knowledge work, and Anthropic says it costs 40% less to run than Opus 5 on typical workloads. Haiku 5.5 suits high-volume jobs such as summarisation.
Consumer plans include a free tier plus Pro, Max and Team. Claude Team seats cost $25 per standard seat monthly or $20 per seat when billed annually, and premium seats cost $125 monthly or $100 annually, based on Anthropic’s US pricing page. Anthropic’s pricing page also lists a fast mode for Opus 5.5 that runs up to 2.5 times faster at double the standard price. Single-source reports put Claude Pro at $20 a month in the US and Max at $100 for 5x or $200 for 20x usage, so check the checkout page before you commit.
Ireland matters to Anthropic in a practical way. The company’s site says services in the EU are provided by Anthropic Ireland Limited, which is relevant for contracts and data-protection paperwork. The company also moved toward public markets: on 26 October it filed an S-1 with the SEC for a proposed IPO, and CNBC’s live coverage of the filing tracks the details. A filing is not a completed listing, so nothing about your subscription changes.
Enterprise adoption gives a sense of where Claude is trusted. Anthropic announced in October that Barclays is scaling Claude for operations and client experience. That is a financial-services use case, not a writing benchmark, but it shows a regulated firm putting the model in front of customers.
A caution on data. A single source reports that from 15 October, Claude Free, Pro and Max users can opt in to having their conversations used to improve Anthropic’s models, with a stated five-year retention for participating conversations. If you paste client drafts into a personal plan, read that setting first. The same source says a usage-policy update takes effect on 12 November 2026.
If you are comparing Claude against the field more widely, our guide to ChatGPT alternatives walks through the switch.
Where it fits: long reports, careful edits, anyone who wants the writing tool with the simplest model choices. Where it lags: we could not verify Irish usage figures for it, so fewer colleagues may share your habits, and the plan limits on heavier tiers are a recurring point of confusion.
Gemini’s pitch is location. Most Irish offices already run Gmail, Docs, Sheets or Meet, and Google puts Gemini inside those tools. That removes the copy-and-paste step that slows every other chatbot, and it is the main reason Gemini earns third place despite a small share of the Irish chatbot market.
The newest model is Gemini 4 Argon, which Google made available on 13 October 2026. Google says Argon reaches Google AI Ultra subscribers in Google Antigravity, and both Ultra and Pro subscribers in the Gemini app and AI Mode in Search. Developers and businesses reach it through the Gemini API, AI Studio, Gemini for business and Gemini in Workspace. Which route you use depends on your plan and, for businesses, on administrator settings.
Workspace news is the part that matters for writers. On 8 October, Google announced a single general-purpose Gemini agent for Google Cloud, built into Workspace applications with data capabilities and governance controls. Between 20 and 21 October, Google began rolling out a dedicated business landing page, marketing and finance skills, and connected-app features to Gemini app users worldwide. If your team writes proposals in Docs and sends them from Gmail, those features target your workflow directly. We cannot verify how well they handle Irish English, so test them with the style sheet prompt above.
Google’s own plan page shows three consumer tiers: Google AI Plus, Google AI Pro and Google AI Ultra. According to that page, the US prices are $19.99 a month for Pro (with an annual option of $199.99) and $99.99 a month for Ultra. Google confirms that Plus includes 400 GB of storage but the page we fetched showed no usable monthly price for it. We could not confirm Irish euro pricing for any tier. Treat the US figures as a guide only.
Developers should note a price change. Google set an introductory Argon API price of $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, with cached input tokens at 95% off. After the introductory period ends on 30 November 2026, the price rises to $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens. If you build a writing tool on Argon, budget for the higher rate from 1 December.
Gemini also has a weakness in the data we could verify: we found no reliable current Irish usage figures for it, so its reach among Irish colleagues is unclear. But colleagues who share a habit make a team’s life easier, and Gemini may not yet have that advantage in Ireland.
Where it fits: Workspace-heavy teams, anyone who drafts inside Gmail or Docs, and businesses that want governance controls. Where it lags: a thin free-tier story in our sources, an API price that doubles on 1 December, and no verified edge in Irish English.
Perplexity is the odd one out, and that is why it earns a place. It is an answer engine and multi-model research platform, not a single chatbot with one voice. Its free, paid individual, education, enterprise and API offerings sit around a product that answers from live search results. For writers whose drafts depend on facts, that is a strong first stop.
Its model list changes often. According to a single-source report, the models offered inside Search have included GPT-6.1 Sol, GPT-6 Astra, Gemini 4 Argon, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Fable 5.1, Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, Grok 4.7 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL. Third-party models can be removed or changed, so do not treat the list as permanent. No Code MBA’s Perplexity release tracker keeps a dated record of model releases if you want to follow the changes.
For writing, the practical effect is flexible: you can pick a Claude or GPT model and still get search-backed answers. The tradeoff is that Perplexity’s own recent model releases are not prose writers. Its open-weight pplx-decider-v1.2 models are reportedly multimodal decision models that return structured decisions and probabilities, not conversational text.
Plan details come from single sources, so hedge them. The free plan reportedly includes basic searches, three Pro Searches a day and one Research query a month. Education Pro is listed at $10 a month after SheerID verification, which makes it the cheapest route for a student who wants multi-model access. Max reportedly adds higher model access, early product access and 10,000 Computer credits a month.
Where does Perplexity fit in an Irish writing routine? Use it for the research half of the job. Ask for a background brief on a topic, check the pages it draws on yourself, then move the facts into Claude or ChatGPT for the drafting. Our comparison of ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity on fact-checking tests how each tool handles a knowledge cutoff, which is the weakness that search-backed answers are meant to fix.
We could not verify current Irish usage figures for Perplexity, so treat it as a research tool that sits alongside a writing assistant rather than replacing one.
Where it fits: researched articles, briefing notes, students and anyone who has to defend each claim. Where it lags: it is a weaker choice for tone-sensitive drafting, since the voice depends on whichever model you pick, and its model line-up changes without notice.
Mistral is the only one of the five that frames itself around European sovereignty, and that framing shapes its appeal in Ireland. On 6 October 2026 the French lab put Mistral Large 4, nicknamed Le Chonk by the company, into public preview through Mistral Studio. Mistral calls it multimodal, with a 1-million-token context window, aimed at coding, agentic workflows and professional document work.
The numbers show a heavy model. Mistral’s engineering announcement with NVIDIA says Large 4 has about 1 trillion total parameters and 49 billion active parameters, was trained on 3,800 NVIDIA Grace Blackwell GPUs in Mistral-operated European data centres, and has weights planned for release by the end of October. Weights for an open-weight release matter if you want to host the model yourself, for example inside an Irish company that cannot send documents to a US cloud.
Preview pricing is low. Mistral lists $1.36 per million input tokens and $4.18 per million output tokens during the preview. That undercuts Claude Sonnet 5.5 at $2 and $10, and Gemini 4 Argon’s introductory $2 and $10. For consumer plans, Mistral’s site says verified students can get Mistral Pro for $5.99 a month, down from the normal $14.99. Those prices are in dollars, so check the euro price at checkout.
Mistral raised €3 billion in a Series D round at a post-money valuation of more than €21 billion, according to its own announcement. That gives it the money to keep competing. Treat one rumour with care: a secondary report says Mistral might replace the permissive Apache 2.0 approach used for an earlier model with a custom commercial licence for Large 4. Mistral has not confirmed this. If you plan to self-host, watch the licence terms when the weights land.
One result from Mistral’s own site deserves a mention without overselling. It says Large 4 surpasses GPT-6 Astra on a visual-grounding test called Dense 200, 42% to 41%. That is a one-point gap on an image task, published by the vendor, and says nothing about prose. We list it because benchmark data for this model is scarce, not because it answers the writing question.
Mistral also broadened beyond chat in October. Voxtral 3, announced on 20 October, covers speech-to-text and text-to-speech for voice agents. None of that affects a person drafting a report, but it shows the lab building a full stack. For the head-to-head with the two US leaders, read our Mistral AI vs ChatGPT vs Claude comparison.
Where it fits: European-hosting preferences, cheap API builds, long documents and people who want to self-host. Where it lags: Large 4 is a preview, we found no evidence of better Irish style, and the Irish market share of Mistral is not tracked in the dataset we verified.
Every price we could verify is in US dollars. We could not confirm euro prices for any plan, so use the figures to compare relative cost, then read the checkout page for tax and the final total. The first table lists subscription prices that appear in verified sources.
Several plans you might expect in that table are missing because only one source covers them. Claude Pro reportedly costs $20 a month in the US, with Max at $100 for 5x usage and $200 for 20x. Google lists AI Pro at $19.99 and AI Ultra at $99.99 on its US plan page. Perplexity lists Education Pro at $10 a month. For a head-to-head on the consumer tiers, our ChatGPT Plus vs Claude Pro vs Perplexity Pro comparison does the maths in euros.
The pattern is simple. Individual writers cluster around the entry paid plans (reportedly about $20 a month at Claude and Google), power users jump to $100 or more, and teams pay per seat. The top tiers add allowance and speed, not obvious writing quality, so most drafters should stop at the entry paid plan or even stay on the free tier.
If you build an internal writing assistant, API prices matter more than app subscriptions. The second table lists per-million-token prices from official pages.
OpenAI reportedly set GPT-6 Sol at $2 input and $10 output, which would match Sonnet 5.5, but we found that figure in a single source. Cost per million tokens does not equal cost per article, because models differ in how much text they spend on reasoning. Run your own documents and compare the invoices. Our deeper API pricing breakdown explains how to estimate monthly spend from a word count.
Here is the honest state of the evidence. Independent writing benchmarks for Irish English do not exist in the material we verified. What does exist falls into three groups: market-share data, vendor-run claims and release trackers. Each answers a different question, and none answers which chatbot writes best?
The only Irish usage data in our verified set comes from StatCounter Global Stats. The figures below are from May 2025, which is 17 months old, so they predate GPT-6, Claude 5.5 and Gemini 4. StatCounter reported:
The second group is vendor claims. Anthropic says Sonnet 5.5 runs 30%+ faster and costs up to 30% less than Sonnet 5 for most work. Anthropic also says Opus 5.5 costs 40% less to run than Opus 5. Mistral’s site reports 42% against 41% for Large 4 over GPT-6 Astra on a visual-grounding test. These are real numbers, but each vendor chose the test and the comparison.
The third group is release trackers such as the No Code MBA tracker noted above, which confirm dates and model names but do not grade output. Put together, the evidence says three things: ChatGPT leads usage, every lab claims gains over its own previous model, and nobody has published a trustworthy Irish writing test. That is why this guide leans on a test you can run yourself.
Named deployments show where the vendors are winning accounts. None is a writing benchmark, but they show what serious buyers pay attention to.
For day-to-day Irish writing, the most useful examples are scenarios. Here are five, each built on facts above. They are illustrations of how to match a tool to a job, not reports of tests we ran.
Scenario 1, a Dublin marketing manager. She drafts proposals in Docs and sends them through Gmail. Gemini inside Workspace saves the copy-and-paste step, so she starts there and tests the output against the style sheet prompt. If the tone drifts, she moves the draft to Claude for a polish.
Scenario 2, a Cork freelance journalist. He needs facts first and phrasing second. He opens Perplexity for the background brief, checks the pages it used, then pastes his notes into Claude Sonnet 5.5 to tighten an 800-word draft. He keeps his own quotes untouched by telling the model to change the minimum needed.
Scenario 3, a Galway student. A verified student can reportedly pay $10 for Perplexity Education Pro or $5.99 for Mistral Pro, and the free tiers of ChatGPT and Claude cost nothing. She should use a free tier for drafting, keep her own argument, and run every citation past the library database. Our Irish CV comparison shows a related test for job applications.
Scenario 4, a Limerick charity. The communications officer writes donor letters weekly. The 75% OpenAI for Nonprofits discount on ChatGPT Business could cut the cost of a shared team seat. She sets one custom instruction with the organisation’s tone and keeps donor data out of personal accounts.
Scenario 5, a Waterford software team. The developers build an internal drafting tool for support replies. Mistral Large 4’s preview price and planned weights suit a self-hosting experiment, while Sonnet 5.5’s caching discount of up to 90% suits repeated prompts with a long fixed style sheet. They run both on 200 real tickets before deciding.
The lesson from all five is the same. Pick the tool that sits where you already work, test it on your own text, and do not pay for tiers whose extra allowance you will never use.
Writing tools see your most sensitive text: client letters, HR notes, draft contracts. Before you pick a favourite, check what each provider does with that text. The verified facts are patchy, so this section separates what we know from what you must check.
On the vendor side, Anthropic states that services in the EU are provided by Anthropic Ireland Limited, which gives Irish buyers a local legal entity for contracts. A single source reports a 15 October change that lets Claude Free, Pro and Max users opt in to model-improvement use of their conversations, with a stated five-year retention for participating chats. Opt-in means you decide, but you should confirm the toggle on every personal account your staff use.
Google says its Workspace Gemini agent comes with data capabilities and governance controls, which matter to IT administrators who need to restrict what staff paste in. Mistral says Large 4 was trained in Mistral-operated European data centres, but training location is not the same as where your prompts get processed, so ask Mistral where inference runs before you sign a contract. We found no verified data-handling facts for ChatGPT or Perplexity in this research round, so read their current privacy pages directly.
A sensible house policy for an Irish business looks like this:
Regulation adds a layer. Our EU AI Act comparison of ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini explains the compliance questions that apply to the providers and to businesses that deploy them. For ordinary drafting, the main duty stays the old one: protect personal data and know where it goes.
The table below turns the evidence into picks. These are editorial recommendations built on plan structure, price and availability. They are not benchmark results.
Two rules sit behind the table. First, if a task is short, use the free tier. The paid plans mostly add allowance, speed and the newest models. Second, if a task is long, test two models on the same document, because long-document drift is where the differences show.
Switching chatbots costs less than it used to, because the real asset is your instructions and examples, not the chat history. Follow these eight steps and you can move in a week.
Watch for three traps. First, model names change. If your instructions say use Sonnet 5 or use GPT-5.6, update them to the current model. Second, limits differ between plans, and OpenAI’s Pro 200 allowance change, with the previous allowance running through 29 October, shows how fast they move. Third, team billing differs: Claude Team plans need at least two members, which matters for a sole trader.
For developers, migration is a code change. Swap the model name, re-run your prompt tests and compare token costs. Remember Gemini 4 Argon’s price rise on 1 December and the preview status of Mistral Large 4 when you budget.
The verdict. For most people in Ireland, the best AI chatbot for writing is ChatGPT, because it combines a free tier on GPT-6 Luna, a paid step up to Sol at the Plus tier, and the biggest user base we could measure. It wins on reach, not on proven prose. If writing is your job and you edit long documents, Claude Sonnet 5.5 deserves the first trial, since Anthropic positions it as the faster, cheaper model for most work and prices it at $2 and $10 per million tokens. Gemini wins for Workspace teams, Perplexity wins the research step, and Mistral wins for anyone who wants a European lab or a self-hosted build.
Do not pay for a $100 or $200 tier to improve your emails. Run the ten checks on the free tiers this week, pick the winner on your own documents, and review the choice again in January, because every lab on this list will ship another model before then.
For most people, ChatGPT, thanks to its free GPT-6 Luna tier and its large Irish user base. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the strongest alternative for long documents and careful editing. No verified benchmark ranks them on Irish English, so test both on your own text.
We could not verify a ranking. No source we checked tests all five products on Irish spelling, institutions or Irish-language output. Use the ten-check test in this guide, and have a fluent speaker review any Gaeilge before you publish.
Yes, for short tasks. ChatGPT Free runs GPT-6 Luna, and Claude, Perplexity and Mistral also offer free access. Paid plans add allowance and the newest models, which matter more for long reports than for emails.
Prices in our sources are in US dollars. Claude Team seats start at $20 billed annually, Mistral Pro costs $14.99 (or $5.99 for verified students), and ChatGPT Pro tiers run $100, $200 and $500. Check euro prices at checkout.
Only on a business plan with the right settings. Strip personal data, check training and retention toggles, and keep a written policy. Check each provider’s training and retention settings on every account your staff use.
On listed API prices, GPT-6 Luna is cheapest at $0.10 input and $0.50 output per million tokens. Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18 in preview, and Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2 and $10. Gemini 4 Argon matches that until 30 November, then moves to $4 and $20.
Not by itself. Perplexity is a multi-model answer engine, so the writing quality depends on which model you select. Its strength is the research step, with search-backed answers that you can check before drafting elsewhere.
Probably. Claude, GPT-6, Gemini 4 Argon and Mistral Large 4 all arrived within about five weeks, and Argon’s introductory API pricing is scheduled to change soon. Re-run the ten checks whenever a provider changes its default model.
Niamh Kelly is the iGaming Editor at Tech Insider, where she previously worked as a freelance fashion journalist for The Irish News for three years and honed her media skills during her time at the BBC. At Tech Insider, she leads Ireland’s coverage with hands-on experience testing consumer and business technology, delivering in-depth analysis on AI, cybersecurity, cloud computing, and hardware trends shaping the future. Kelly was featured in RSVP online as part of their “Women of Style” series and has interviewed notable figures such as Katie Price and Louise Redknapp for major beauty product launches.
Tech Insider delivers in-depth coverage of the technologies shaping the future: AI, cybersecurity, cloud computing, hardware, and the trends that matter.
