Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
Browse by Topic
Read & Learn
Users of AI chatbots, photo tools and voice assistants, job applicants screened by AI, and drivers recorded by license-plate cameras are the subject of dozens of artificial-intelligence class actions filed or decided in 2026, including suits filed in October against Grok and Meta. Most are unproven complaints with nothing to claim; two AI-adjacent settlements are taking claims.
This tracker summarizes class action complaints, court rulings and settlements involving artificial intelligence. The claims in the pending lawsuits are unproven allegations, and the companies named deny them. Unless a settlement is listed as taking claims, there is nothing to file. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
Free settlement alerts
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
California residents: see our Notice at Collection & Privacy Choices.
Two AI-adjacent settlements were taking claims as of October 24, 2026: the $4.7 million Neutrogena Skin360 biometric privacy settlement for people who used the face-scanning skin assessment in Illinois, with claims due November 25, 2026, and the $359.9 million RealPage rent-pricing software settlement for renters at settling landlords, with claims due January 29, 2027. The pending AI lawsuits in this tracker have no settlement or claim form.
The largest groups are privacy suits over chatbots and AI assistants, biometric privacy suits under Illinois law over AI tools that scan faces or voices, wiretapping suits over AI that listens to customer-service calls or meetings, suits over license-plate readers and other AI surveillance cameras, copyright and right-of-publicity suits over AI training data, discrimination and credit-reporting suits over AI hiring tools, and antitrust suits over algorithmic pricing. All of the pending cases are unproven allegations.
Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act requires companies to give notice, get written consent and publish a retention policy before collecting face geometry, voiceprints or other biometric identifiers, and it lets individuals sue for $1,000 per negligent violation or $5,000 per intentional or reckless violation. That private right to sue is why suits over AI photo editing, face recognition and skin-analysis apps are often brought on behalf of Illinois residents.
OCA found no lawsuit over the border towers as of October 24, 2026. A New York Times investigation published October 22, 2026 reported that AI-enabled surveillance towers along the border can see into homes and schoolyards on the U.S. side. The license-plate-reader challenges filed this fall in San Diego and Wisconsin concern city and police camera networks, not the border towers.
