A Video Game Lawsuit Shows How Discovery Into AI Chat Logs Is Changing The Game – marketscreener.com

Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
Enter your password
Published on 06/19/2026 at 02:18 am EDT
A recent Delaware Court of Chancery opinion arising from the acquisition of a video game studio carries an important lesson far beyond M&A litigation: AI chatbot exchanges are now entering the discovery record and affecting case outcomes. 
In Fortis Advisors LLC v. Krafton, Inc., the dispute was a familiar one: whether, years after an acquisition, former stockholders of the acquired company were entitled to an additional earnout payment based on post-closing performance. What makes the case unique—at least for now—is the evidence the Court found especially persuasive: the buyer CEO’s chatbot prompts and the AI-generated responses.
For litigators across all practice areas and the clients they counsel, the takeaway is immediate: AI chat logs have entered the e-discovery stream and may be consequential evidence. That development will not stay confined to nine-figure Delaware corporate disputes. It is coming to civil litigation broadly, and lawyers and their clients need to be thinking about it now.
Background
The plaintiff represents the former stockholders of Unknown Worlds Entertainment, the studio behind video game Subnautica. In 2021, Krafton acquired Unknown Worlds for a $500 million upfront payment, plus up to $250 million in contingent earnout payments tied to revenue through 2025. The agreement preserved operational control for Unknown Worlds’ founders and CEO, who Krafton could only remove for narrowly defined cause.
In July 2025—weeks before the anticipated release of Subnautica 2 and months before the earnout period ended—Krafton terminated the founders and CEO citing concerns about their supposed “intention to proceed with the premature release of Subnautica 2,” which Krafton claimed would damage the franchise. Krafton took over control of Unknown Worlds’ operations and delayed the game’s launch.
Unknown World’s former stockholders sued, claiming Krafton’s actions were a breach of the agreement.
Discovery revealed that, just weeks before the terminations, Krafton’s CEO received internal projections showing that a successful launch of Subnautica 2 in August 2025—as Unknown Worlds was planning—would likely trigger most or all of the $250 million earnout. Concerned that Krafton had overpaid, the CEO turned to an AI chatbot for advice on how to avoid the obligation.
After the AI chatbot told the CEO the earnout would be “difficult to cancel,” he asked it for a path forward. The chatbot suggested forming an internal task with a mandate to either negotiate a deal on the earnout or execute a “takeover” of Unknown Worlds. It also generated a “Response Strategy to a ‘No-Deal Scenario,” including a “pressure and leverage package” and an “implementation roadmap.”
Over the following weeks, the CEO and his team took steps that closely tracked those recommendations, culminating in the July terminations. 
In light of this evidence, Vice Chancellor Will found that Krafton’s stated justifications were pretextual and that its actions breached the agreement. The Court reinstated the former CEO with full operational authority and extended the earnout period to account for the time lost during the wrongful termination. 
What This Case Means for Litigants
The CEO’s exchanges with the chatbot did not just add color to the narrative — they were central to the court’s finding that Krafton’s stated justifications for the terminations were pretextual and that its true motive was financial.
As clients increasingly rely on AI tools in the ordinary course of business, those interactions are likely to surface in litigation. And when they do, they may provide a uniquely direct record of strategy, intent, and contemporaneous thinking. The question now is how to manage these risks. Some practical steps lawyers and their clients can take include:
Fortis v. Krafton is an early and unusually public example of how AI-generated material can shape the course and outcome of high-stakes litigation. It is unlikely to remain an outlier for long.
Mr John B. Lawrence Baker Botts LLP
2001 Ross Avenue
Suite 900
Dallas
75201-2980
UNITED STATES
Tel: 713229 1234
Fax: 713229 1522
E-mail: bobby.bitner@bakerbotts.com
URL: www.bakerbotts.com

© Mondaq Ltd, 2026 – Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 – http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing
Trader
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite) and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be carried out. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of rankings based on the following ratings: Returns (Composite), Profitability (Composite) and Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
ESG MSCI
The MSCI ESG score assesses a company’s environmental, social, and governance practices relative to its industry peers. Companies are rated from CCC (laggard) to AAA (leader). This rating helps investors incorporate sustainability risks and opportunities into their investment decisions.
 
Currency / Forex
Commodities
Cryptocurrencies
Interest Rates
Best financial
portal
More than 20 years
at your side
1,300,000 +
members
Quick & easy
cancellation
Our Experts
are here for you
OUR EXPERTS ARE HERE FOR YOU
Monday – Friday 9am-6pm CET
Select your edition
All financial news and data tailored to specific country editions
NORTH AMERICA
MIDDLE EAST
EUROPE
APAC

source