Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
Information agency «Ukrainian National News»
Subject in the field of online media; media identifier – R40-05926
This resource is intended for persons who have reached the age of 21.
All rights reserved. © 2007 — 2025
Kyiv • UNN
• 1928 views
Investigative reporter John Carreyrou, known for exposing Theranos, has filed a lawsuit against xAI, Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, Meta Platforms and Perplexity. He accuses the companies of using copyrighted books to train their artificial intelligence systems without permission.
An investigative reporter, best known for exposing fraud at the Silicon Valley blood-testing startup Theranos, on Monday sued Elon Musk’s xAI, Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, Meta Platforms, and Perplexity for using copyrighted books without permission to train their artificial intelligence systems, UNN reports with reference to Reuters.
New York Times reporter and author of “Bad Blood” John Carreyrou filed a lawsuit in a California federal court along with five other authors, accusing AI companies of pirating their books and feeding them into large language models (LLMs) that power the companies’ chatbots.
This lawsuit is one of several copyright lawsuits brought by authors and other copyright holders against technology companies over the use of their work in AI training. This case is the first in which xAI is named as a defendant.
Unlike other cases under consideration, the authors are not seeking to join a larger class action lawsuit – a type of lawsuit that, they say, favors defendants by allowing them to negotiate a single settlement with many plaintiffs.
“Companies specializing in the legal field should not be able to extinguish thousands and thousands of high-value claims so easily at favorable prices,” the lawsuit states.
In August, Anthropic reached the first major settlement in an AI training copyright dispute, agreeing to pay $1.5 billion to a group of authors who claimed the company had pirated millions of books. The new lawsuit states that members of the group in that case would receive “a tiny fraction (only 2%) of the copyright law’s statutory limit of $150,000” for each infringed work.
During a November hearing in the Anthropic class action lawsuit, U.S. District Judge William Alsup criticized a separate law firm co-founded by Roche for soliciting authors to opt out of the settlement in search of a “better deal.” Roche declined to comment on Monday.
Later in the hearing, Carreyrou told the judge that stealing books to create Anthropic’s AI was “original sin” and that the settlement did not go far enough.
Trump sues BBC for $10 billion over alleged misrepresentation of his speech16.12.25, 09:43 • 3545 views
Julia Shramko
