Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
Google is keeping its eye on the potential LLM bubble burst. But despite that, it–like pretty much every other major tech company–continues pouring cash into generative AI, rolling out new tools for users, marketers, and creators in hopes of achieving…something.
While there’s been plenty of kickback against previous Google tools, like the AI overviews for both Search results and YouTube videos, and praise for other tools like chatbot Gemini, this latest tool might end up being one of its most divisive.
Last week, an update on the Google Support forum revealed that over the last few months, staffers have been working on Portraits, an “experimental feature” it said “lets viewers conversationally interact with AI representations of participating creators and gives these creators insights into topics that their audiences are interested in.”
Google was careful to say the creators whose Portraits will become available to fans had “specifically chosen to participate,” and had allowed Google to use their content and other sources to design their AI selves.
This isn’t a novel idea. Back in 2023, Amouranth partnered with a company called Forever Voices AI to launch her own AI chatbot with extra parasocial flavor. The bot was advertised to fans as “unparalleled personal access to an AI copy of Amouranth herself, whenever and wherever they desire,” in an experience that “blurs the lines between reality and virtual interaction.”
She was perhaps the most notable creator do this, but wasn’t alone. Snapchatter Caryn Marjorie, for example, released her own AI bot, and quickly experienced how wrong things could go: Following the bot’s debut, she received death threats, and there were reportedly issues where CarynAI was sending sexually suggestive messages despite not being programmed to generate NSFW content.
These bots notably didn’t become permanent installations. CarynAI was shut down in 2024, and Amouranth’s chatbot abruptly went dark in November 2023, after Forever Voices AI’s founder/CEO was arrested for alleged attempted arson. To date, we haven’t seen creator avatars launch with any sort of staying power.
And similar fabricated creator interaction services haven’t fared well either. AsqMe, a company founded in 2023, partnered with creators to make their own “personal conversational AI” that would answer fan questions via text, written to mimic the creator’s unique voice.
It shut down earlier this month after failing to find “a strategic buyer to acquire its platform, AI technology, and two issued patents,” it said in a statement.
“AsqMe made the process effortless with features such as First Draft which uses AI to respond to audience questions based on the creator’s own content. And Question Intercept which pulls questions from the creator’s comments and posts replies back with affiliate links,” the company added.
AsqMe didn’t say how many users it had, just claimed that “[b]y all traditional measures AsqMe was winning.” But the tools it offered weren’t enough to tempt an acquisition.
Now we wonder if Google’s AI bots, which offer similar Q&A interactions with added visual stimuli, will actually offer fans something they want.
As eMarketer recently reported, more than half of U.S. adults are unlikely to interact with AI-generated influencers. Gen X and Baby Boomers are more leery of bots (63% said they wouldn’t interact) but skepticism is strong amongst Gen Z and Millennials too (51%).
On top of that, 32% of consumers think gen AI had a negatively disrupting effect on the creator economy in 2025, per Billion Dollar Boy. That’s a jump from 2023, when 18% of consumers felt similarly.
Appealing to parasocial appetites might give YouTube a bump in the short term, but it’s human creators who have carried the platform from its earliest days to two full decades of being the single biggest video destination on the internet. Human creators keep billions of users watching–and thus generating ad revenue for Google.
Spending months figuring out a way to make fake copies of those real influencers is certainly a choice, and based on the history and data points we laid out above, Portraits has a hard road to viability. If someone wants to engage with a YouTuber, they can watch videos or leave a comment, or pay for the person’s Channel Membership or Patreon for more direct access.
Creators and viewers are closer than ever these days–so will fans really settle for a digital pull-string doll?
Stay up-to-date with the latest and breaking creator and online video news delivered right to your inbox.
Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories
© Copyright 2007 – 2025 Tubefilter, Inc.