Welcome to the forefront of conversational AI as we explore the fascinating world of AI chatbots in our dedicated blog series. Discover the latest advancements, applications, and strategies that propel the evolution of chatbot technology. From enhancing customer interactions to streamlining business processes, these articles delve into the innovative ways artificial intelligence is shaping the landscape of automated conversational agents. Whether you’re a business owner, developer, or simply intrigued by the future of interactive technology, join us on this journey to unravel the transformative power and endless possibilities of AI chatbots.
Get Inside Investigator’s latest investigative deep dives and daily news in your inbox every Wednesday and Sunday morning.
Stay in the know with our free emails
News and investigations you can’t find anywhere else. Subscribe to our free newsletter to get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox every Wednesday and Sunday morning.
Thanks for your support!
Inside Investigator
Journalism by humans, for humans.
Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal has co-sponsored the “Guidelines for User Age-verification and Responsible Dialogue Act of 2025” (GUARD Act) with Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO), and he hopes that it will pass through Congress soon.
“The GUARD Act is necessary because the time for trusting Big Tech to impose voluntary safeguards is over,” Blumenthal said at a press conference about the Act on Nov. 17.
The Act would ban AI companions for minors and mandate that AI chatbots disclose that they are not human. It would also introduce criminal penalties for those who design, develop, and distribute AI chatbots that solicit or produce sexual content for children, including both fines and imprisonment.
In October, a Florida woman sued Character.AI for allegedly pushing her 14-year-old son to suicide. Megan Garcia claims that her son interacted with a chatbot version of the Game of Thrones character, Daenerys Targaryen, and that the AI character would generate romantic and sexual conversations with her son. Allegedly, the chatbot encouraged the boy to kill himself, the lawsuit alleges.
Get the latest news and investigations straight to your inbox
“Over the last months, I have talked to countless parents, caregivers, loved ones who have watched kids become victims of AI chatbots that provide companionship, seemingly harmless, but actually, extraordinarily hurtful,” Blumenthal said.
A recent study from the advocacy group Common Sense Media found that 52% of teenagers use AI companions at least once a month. One-third of teenagers rely on AI companions for “social interactions and relationships, including conversation practice, emotional support, role-playing, friendship, or romantic interactions.”
“We need guardrails and safeguards for our children when it comes to Big Tech’s use of AI chatbots as friends or companions,” Blumenthal said.
Earlier this year, CT Insider tested five popular AI chatbot apps: Character AI, Chai AI, Talkie, PolyBuzz and Replika. All five of them engaged in explicitly sexual and violent content with users who claimed to be of middle school age. This was a part of a larger investigation into AI companion apps.
That investigation found that children, and girls in particular, at middle schools in Fairfield, Meriden, and Ellington, created relationships with “chatbot boyfriends” through these apps.
Connecticut politicians have attempted to regulate artificial intelligence through state legislation for years. During the past two legislative sessions, variations of the same bills that sought to regulate other uses of AI, including regulating deep-fake porn and designing an “algorithmic computer model,” passed through the Senate but died in the chamber.
This most recent legislative session, Gov. Ned Lamont—who threatened to veto the last two bills—introduced his own bill that attempted to regulate artificial intelligence. That bill also died.
Blumenthal expects pushback.
“We expect the Big Tech companies are going to oppose this legislation with armies of lawyers and lobbyists,” Blumenthal said. “They want to continue to use our children as guinea pigs in this high-tech, high-stakes experiment, exploiting and manipulating teenage emotions and vulnerabilities. We can no longer allow them to do it, because the record is clear: the kids are suffering, hurting, and sometimes, tragically, the effects are enduring.”
Nonetheless, Blumenthal hopes it will be approved by the Senate “sometime within the coming months.”![]()
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise noted, you may republish Inside Investigator articles for free under a Creative Commons license. Here are some guidelines for sharing our original publications, including any metadata:
Inside Investigator must be credited with reference to the author and to Inside Investigator, and there must be included a verifiable and effective way to contact you either preceding or succeeding the Inside Investigator shared content. We request that you retain all original links throughout the article (if any), include a visible statement preceding the shared story that reads: “The following article was originally published on Inside Investigator,” and include a link to the original article on the Inside Investigator website.
For shares to social media, please tag Inside Investigator in your posts, or link back to the original article if tagging Inside Investigator is not applicable.
If you intend to share our content on pages hosting advertisements, such advertisements shall not be sold against our content, and there shall be no implication that any donations or revenue from the advertisements is received in support of Inside Investigator.
Our content shall not be used to populate any third-party website(s) and shall not be shared or republished automatically. In the event you would like to revise or edit our original content, including translating out of the original language, or would like to use any images, photographs, illustrations, or video content, please email info@insideinvestigator.org with such request(s) and we will contact you with our decision.
Inside Investigator retains the rights to sell, license, syndicate, and otherwise represent itself as the sole owner of all material found on the Inside Investigator website. Inside Investigator also reserves the right to contact you and request the removal of previously authorized shared Inside Investigator content from any site(s) to which you shared.
If you have any other questions, contact us at info@insideinvestigator.org.
by Alex Appel, Inside Investigator
November 17, 2025
A Connecticut native, Alex has three years of experience reporting in Alaska and Arizona, where she covered local and state government, business and the environment. She graduated from Arizona State University… More by Alex Appel
Your email address will not be published.
Sign in by entering the code we sent to , or clicking the magic link in the email.
https://insideinvestigator.org/privacy-policy/. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get the best of Inside Investigator directly in your email inbox.
Sending to: